Conference interpreter training in Sweden

Courses to prepare conference interpreters got a big push when Sweden voted to join the EU.

Before Sweden joined the European Union in 1995, Swedish was one of the more exotic languages in the conference world. Its use was basically limited to the international trade union organisations and to meetings held in Sweden. There were no more than twenty-five interpreters in the whole world with a Swedish "A". Most got their training at ETI in Geneva. Other options included ESIT in Paris and Heidelberg and Germersheim in Germany.

In the field of training, Sweden has had well-established courses for community interpreters since the 1960s, initially in languages such as Finnish, Serbo-Croatian and Spanish with Arabic, Somali and Albanian being added later. These training courses are organised as "study circles" or at the Swedish institutes for adult education known as folk high schools. There were also occasional three-semester university certificate courses. There has been a national authorization scheme for community interpreters since 1976. The only conference interpreter training was offered at the regional level to satisfy the needs of the Nordic Council for interpretation between Finnish and the Scandinavian languages.

On 13 November 1994, the Swedish people were asked to say "yea" or "nay" to the European Union in a national referendum. During the 1993/94 academic year, Stockholm University's Institute of Translation and Interpreting offered a six-month postgraduate course in conference interpretation to better prepare the country should it enter the EU and to revitalize the stock of interpreters with Swedish in their language combination. This course was taught by conference interpreters, most of them members of AIIC. They were given a free hand to design and run the course in accordance with AIIC guidelines for interpretation schools. The first class graduated in May 1994.

The day after Sweden voted to join the EU, planning began for a second course and conference interpretation began to pick up speed. Five courses have now been completed, with the most recent class graduating in June 2000. A total of some 45 students have passed the final examinations. The Stockholm Institute (TÖI) has now joined the "European Masters in Conference Interpretation" program and our training program, now extended to eight months, has merited AIIC's highest rating of three stars.

What does the future hold? The stage of an urgent need for Swedish interpreters has passed and we can consider the period of "rescue service" over. The current phase may be described as one of consolidation of the knowledge and practical experience of recent graduates. The needs of the EU after the Swedish presidency and as the enlargement process continues are uncertain. With this in mind, the program is not being offered for the 2000-2001 academic year and will resume at the earliest in autumn 2002. TÖI is considering changing to a two-year course of studies, but Swedish students may be reluctant to devote such a period to full-time postgraduate studies in interpretation. A one-year course with a preparatory semester has also been proposed. Consideration is also being given to including the language of an EU candidate country, such as Polish or Estonian, in addition to the traditional "major" languages.

At present there are also a few students with Swedish in their language combinations in programs in Paris, Geneva and Turku.

For further information, please go to:



Recommended citation format:
Eva BONNARD-SJÖGREN. "Conference interpreter training in Sweden". aiic.net November 23, 2000. Accessed October 19, 2019. <http://aiic.net/p/284>.



Message board

Comments 2

The most recent comments are on top

OJUTIKU TAWAKALITU ABIOLA

   

KINDLY SEND AND INFORMATION.

Total likes: 0 0 | 0

Brigitte Schön

   

Thank you for a very interesting article. I think you agree that writing my reaction in English makes more sense - I don't want to exclude too many colleagues.

Working from Swedish myself, I have noticed the following developments ever since Sweden joined the EU:

1) At the European Parliament, I (still)often find myself as de facto single pivot for Swedish, since the second pivot is often in the Danish booth, which is only covered by another two pivots, not always in easily accessible booths, i.e. Dutch, e.g. This means that Swedish is relegated to a status we are not used to at the EP, i.e. just covered by one pivot. I have experienced many situations where my booth (German) was in a triple relais if I left the booth. Swedish was in the Danish booth (I did the Danish in my booth)and Danish was in the Dutch booth (I did the Dutch in my booth).

Thanks to my incessable, really incessable constant protests with the planning of the European Parliament, things have improved slightly. But we are still in a situation where many colleagues actually accept this untenable situation. There are enough colleagues with passive Swedish around, they are just not engaged by the EP because by using the Danish booth as no 2 pivot, they are theoretically conforming to requirements. I exhort colleagues to follow my example far more rigorously than they have been doing so far. Protest! Don't put up with it! You are not doing yourselves any favour by acting as single pivot! And, apart from anything else, next time it's you who is not engaged because somebody else has accepted the role of de-facto single pivot!

2)In Council and Commission, I have experienced a totally different eye-opener. According to the team sheet, we often had even 3 people who were able to interprete from Swedish, still Swedish was not to be spoken. 9-9 was the rule of the game. I did point this out to Annica Östlund, head of the SCIC Swedish booth, because I get angry when I see games of this sort. Again, Swedish was being discriminated against for no obvious reason.

3)If any of you have any connections to the people who are translating into Swedish: Some of the texts are clearly unrevised. Since Sweidish isn't my strongest language, I regularly check Swedish legal texts against the German version, and I can just hope it won't all end up at the Court in Luxembourg at some stage. Change of terminology in the middle of a directive is not unusual (change of translator, I guess). I have seen Swedish texts that said something different than the German texts, I wouldn't know which one was the authoritative version, but we are talking LEGAL texts, so I admit I was shocked. They seem to be cutting corners on the revision front. At a steep price eventually, I'd say.

4) And it was a shock for all of us who have known Sweden and the Swedes for decades that you guys can actually speak so FAST!! Where and when did you learn that??? I used to be able to day-dream while I listened to Swedes unrolling their stories. Quite frankly, we all would have preferred you had remained that way!

Total likes: 0 0 | 0