Expression of support for interpreters at Khmer Rouge Trials

Local Cambodian interpreters have gone three months without being paid and have not yet had contracts renewed for 2013. AIIC's Asia-Pacific region calls for a quick solution.

AIIC Asia Pacific Region

The Asia-Pacific regional chapter of AIIC (the International Association of Conference Interpreters):

Having been apprised of the dire situation which our Cambodian colleague interpreters are currently facing in regard of their conditions of employment and remuneration at the UNAKRT-assisted Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, in Phnom Penh, Cambodia:

Wishes to express its sympathy and support for their efforts to obtain decent conditions of work and remuneration, commensurate with the obvious importance of their contribution to the smooth operation of the Khmers Rouge trials;

Calls upon all the parties concerned to seek to attain a swift and satisfactory resolution of the issues at hand;

Trusts that an environment conducive to the full and secure expression of the crucial skills of our colleagues and respectful of their dignity will be achieved shortly.

The facts

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) are a national court, under Cambodian jurisdiction. The ECCC is provided technical assistance through the United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (UNAKRT). Both entities are funded separately. The ECCC operates through funds earmarked by the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC). UNAKRT's budget is determined by donor states. The RGC has also received dedicated financial support from international donors over the past years for the operation of the ECCC. The RCG has repeatedly stated publicly that it has already made its maximum contribution for the 2013 budget for the ECCC.

  • All sections of the court, including the Interpretation and Translation Unit (ITU)) are staffed by national (ECCC) and international (UNAKRT) personnel. Some of the international interpreters at the ITU are members of AIIC.
  • On 21 December 2012, national staff, including Cambodian interpreters and translators, were told that they would not be receiving contract renewals and salaries due to of lack of funding.
  • On 22 January a petition to boycott work, effective as of 18 February was announced by national staff. The boycott was then postponed to 28 February, on the basis of a promise made by the administration that a solution would be found by then.
  • National staff continued to work with no contracts and received no salaries for the months of December 2012, and January and February 2013.
  • On March 4, at the start of the court hearing, the national interpreters announced that they would not resume work unless their salaries for December, January and February were paid to them. They then left the booths and the boycott became effective immediately.
  • On the same day, 4 March, national ITU staff were called to a meeting with administration. They were asked to resume work immediately.  Staff refused.
  • At another meeting that day, they were told that they could be dismissed and replaced.
  • On 5 March, Cambodian interpreters agreed to resume work upon payment of their salary for December 2012 only. If no contract for 2013 were signed by the end of March, a new boycott would be implemented as of 1 April.
  • As of now, no formal reply has been received. National staff continue to report to their office.
  • There have been no court hearings since 4 March 2013.

Recommended citation format:
Asia-Pacific Region of AIIC. "Expression of support for interpreters at Khmer Rouge Trials". aiic.net. March 11, 2013. Accessed March 25, 2017. <http://aiic.net/p/6467>.



Message board

Comments 1

The most recent comments are on top

Julia DELILLE-GOMORY

   

Thank you for this more detailed report. I am very pleased and proud that aiic is defending the 'local' Cambodian interpreters. I am certain that they provide relay for the English/French booths without which communication/justice would be impossible. Actually their boycott serves to point out the unfairness of having 2 categories of personnel - the so-called locals and the 'international' personnel, who no-doubt receive better salaries and benefits. I would be interested in knowing whether the lawyers and judges are supporting this boycott. Contrary to what the administration claims, I seriously doubt they could be replaced so quickly. Besides who can afford to work full-time for free?

Total likes: 0 0 | 0